Unity is facing a boycott from mobile game developers who have turned off its ad products. In response to the widespread opposition from gaming developers, this latest decision was announced. Numerous studios have pulled their ads from Unity and IronSource, with more being invited to join the boycott.

The call to boycott Unity is a result of worries over how installation-dependent fees will hurt both small and large game developers. According to these developers, this decision was made without any industry consultation and ignores the unique challenges and complexities of their field.

A Brief History of the Unity Boycott

The Unity boycott started in response to their September 12 statement about installing fee changes starting January 1, 2024. Many game developers were surprised and outraged by this decision. The joint communiqué from game development companies reveals that little to no discussion occurred before making a major decision.

The game development industry relies on Unity, which has encouraged developers to build immersive worlds and empowered independent creators to make their ideas come true. With Unity, game creation stands on a cornerstone of the industry. This latest move might destabilize the ecosystem they have fostered.

Reasons for the Boycott

The main reason for the boycott is Unity’s proposed Runtime Fee policy. Small and large studios alike feel that this fee will have a negative impact on them due to financial challenges they already experience. The claim by Unity that only 10% of the industry will be affected is considered misleading and incorrect reflection of reality.

This decision was made without any industry consultation or stakeholder dialogue. This sudden change, which puts hundreds of studios at risk, has game developers feeling blindsided. Analyzing charging per mile based on the age of a vehicle bought last year, it showed the challenges these fees create for people, as well as organizations alike.

The gaming industry is already facing tightening profit margins, intensifying competition, and rising costs in both development and marketing. The introduction of installation-dependent fees just makes the existing problems worse and risks causing companies to shut down—a situation nobody wants.

Impact on Mobile Game Developers

Boycotting the ad platform resulted in many mobile game developers shutting down all IronSource and Unity Ads monetization on their projects until resolution is reached. Companies like Azur Games, Voodoo, Homa, Century Games, SayGames, CrazyLabs, Original Games, Ducky, Burny Games, Inspired Square, Geisha Tokyo, tatsumaki games, KAYAC, New Story, Playgendary and Supercent have joined forces to protest against Unity’s Runtime Fee policy.

The boycott has a noticeable effect on Unity, as well as on game developers involved. If these studios no longer back Unity, this could lead to a drop in advertising revenue. In contrast, mobile game developers could struggle financially because Unity Ads do not offer monetization. However, they are willing to carry this burden believing it essential for preserving their industry and sustaining a reasonable union with Unity.

Analysis of Unity’s Approach to Meet Present Obstacles & Forecast for Progress

As of now, there is no word from Unity about the boycott situation. Game developers are waiting for Unity to address their concerns. Will Unity ultimately decide to alter its Runtime Fee policy or negotiate with other players in the industry.

This situation will determine the future for both parties. If Unity ignores the concerns raised by game developers, their refusal to address these issues will cause strain on their relationship with studios, which could have lasting effects within the gaming industry.


The unity boycott declared by mobile game developers represents a strong statement against what they feel is an unfair decision that poses risks to their livelihoods and undermines the cooperative nature of their industry. Unity and IronSource are hoping that by temporarily removing ads, others who take a similar stance will join them in solidarity.

When making decisions, Unity must remember its impact on open and collaborative gaming communities that rely on the exchange of knowledge and experiences. Engaging in open dialogue and finding a fair and equitable resolution is crucial for both mobile game developers and Unity as they navigate this ongoing saga to support the growth and sustainability of their shared industry.